By Corrie MacLaggan

AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - Texas' Republican-controlled Senate has voted to ban most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, ending a high-profile political battle that stirred debate over abortion rights well beyond the state's borders.

Already approved by the House, the sweeping bill to restrict abortions now goes to Republican Governor Rick Perry, who is certain to sign it and had called a second special session of the legislature to get it through.

It makes Texas the 13th U.S. state to pass a 20-week ban. The 20-week provision is based on disputed research suggesting fetuses feel pain at that point in a pregnancy. Current limits are 26 weeks in Texas.

The Senate passed the measure late on Friday by a vote of 19 to 11 in front of a full public gallery while protesters yelled and chanted outside the chamber.

The issue has stirred huge attention, including internationally, in part because of an 11-hour filibuster in June against the bill by state Senator Wendy Davis, a Democrat. Her actions at the time prompted comparisons with the James Stewart movie "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington".

Despite political support in Texas for the bill, there could be legal hurdles. Courts have blocked the ban in three of the 12 states that passed it, and opponents of the Texas bill vowed to challenge the decision in court.

Thousands of activists for and against the bill gathered at the state capitol this summer for rallies and marches and to testify at public hearings.

"Let's draw the line and not torture these babies that are aborted," bill supporter Senator Bob Deuell, a Republican and a family physician, said during Friday's nine-hour debate.

The Texas measure would change standards for abortion clinics in ways that opponents say would cause dozens of the facilities to shut down, forcing Texans to turn to illegal, unsafe means. Bill supporters disagree that clinics would have to close.

"This bill is creating a situation where women in Texas today not only will not be made safer but they will absolutely be at risk of their health," said Davis.

The bill also requires doctors performing an abortion to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion clinic. Supporters of that provision said it was important in case complications arose in an abortion and the woman needed to be hospitalized.

The Texas legislation also calls for stricter guidelines for how doctors administer abortion-inducing drugs, such as the regimen known as RU-486.

PACKED STATEHOUSE

The pink granite statehouse was packed on Friday, with Texans opposed to the bill wearing orange and holding signs that said, "My body, my choice," some of them jumping, chanting and loudly shouting outside the Senate chamber.

Those supporting the bill wore blue, some carrying Bibles and crosses and holding signs that said things like, "Unborn babies feel pain."

"What happened here tonight is going to fast-forward change in Texas in the long run, but unfortunately a lot of women will suffer in the process," said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Perry called lawmakers back to Austin for a second special session to reconsider the proposal after Davis's successful filibuster, and this time lawmakers were not fighting the clock. The second special session began July 1 and could last up to 30 days.

"Today the Texas legislature took its final step in our historic effort to protect life," Perry said in a statement.

The Texas Department of Public Safety increased security for Friday's debate, searching bags of everyone who entered the Senate gallery. The department said officers found 18 jars containing what appeared to be feces, one jar suspected of containing urine and three bottles of what they think is paint.

"All of these items - as well as significant quantities of feminine hygiene products, glitter and confetti possessed by individuals - were required to be discarded; otherwise those individuals were denied entry into the gallery," the department said in a statement.

The confiscation of feminine hygiene products sparked an outcry on social media about "tampongate".

(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Jeremy Gaunt)

."

View gallery

The German parliament will pass a law that gives same-sex civil unions the same tax advantages as heterosexual marriages. Conservative politicians from Germany's ruling party oppose the law, but will still vote in favor.

Manfred Bausch and his partner have a traditional relationship. They just finished building a house in Aachen, a town in western Germany, and are now in the midst of moving.
"We pretty much lead a normal life, just like any other family," Bausch tells DW. He's a passionate hobby chef and likes to cook for his partner and their friends. The two men like to go to the movies or to see a play. For 10 years, they have been doing almost everything together- except for their tax returns. Until now, they each had to complete separate forms.
But that's about to change. On Thursday (27.06.2013), the Bundestag is likely to pass an amendment to the income tax law. This change will allow homosexual couples who live in civil unions to take advantage of certain tax perks that were previously only open to married couples. Germany does not currently recognize same-sex marriages.
An important political signal
Bausch and his partner will see a significant change in their wallets if the law is enacted: "I'm guessing we'll save around 3,500 euros ($4,560) a year," he said.
Bausch said there's an important political shift behind the law: "For me, this law is an important milestone, because we also have a financial equality for same-sex partnerships now."
Manfred Bruns, a board member of the Lesbian and Gay Federation in Germany (LSVD), called the new law a success: "This is something we have pushed for a very long time, basically since the beginning of civil unions here in 2001."
While Bruns and Bausch are excited about the change, they aren't happy with how the law made it into the Bundestag. The parliamentary group of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), had fought the tax equality of civil unions for a long time. The current bill only came to pass after a decision was made in May by the Constitutional Court, Germany's highest court.
The judges ruled that the same tax laws should be applied to civil unions as to marriages, including perks that allows married couples to pool their income as a means of paying less in taxes. In the judges' view, the current law breaches the general equality provision that is anchored in the constitution. The opposition Social Democrats and the Greens, as well as the CDU's free-market liberal coalition partner, the FDP, had demanded a change in the income tax law to benefit civil unions before the constitutional court's decision.

Reluctant agreement
After the court's ruling, CDU and CSU lawmakers will also likely vote in favor of the tax equalization law. Norbert Geis, a CSU delegate and opponent of the law, said he will vote for bill because of the Constitutional Court's decision. But he will do so reluctantly.
"I believe that you can only equalize something that is actually equal," Geis told DW. "You cannot say that homosexual partners are equal to a marriage, because marriage is something different from these unions." He said he will vote in favor of the law, because one "can't provoke a conflict with the constitution for this."
The income tax law will be passed by the Bundestag backdated to August 1, 2001. The government estimates that the tax equalization will cost 175 million euros in 2013 and 55 million euros per year in the years to come.

A call to open up marriage
The equal footing on tax law is another step in the direction of total equality between civil unions and marriage, according to Bruns and Bausch.
"Another important step will be full right of adoption," Bausch added. The good of the child is the most important factor for him, "but that can be taken care of by same-sex couples as well as by heterosexuals."
Bruns went a step further: "We are now facing the question: 'why do we have to separate institutions if they have basically the same rights?' That's why we demand the legalization of gay marriage."
Only time will tell whether Bruns's and Bausch's hopes will come true.
"It depends on the outcome of the next federal election in September," Bruns added. "All parties are in favor of it, except, like always, CDU and CSU."
Germany's next federal elections will take place in September.